As an author, it is my job to
engage my readers with substantive characters and plot-lines that get them
invested in my
books. I enjoy hearing their passionate responses, when we have an occasion
to chat, whether in-person or through social media engagement. While it is
rewarding to me as a fictional author it scares me to the core when it crosses
over to the non-fiction world.
A few weeks back I wrote an
article asking the question: What
Happened to Civility in America. In it, I pointed the finger of blame at
politicians and pundits who have worked hand in hand to ramp up the level of
acrimony in the United States for their personal gain. They have gotten remarkably good at being
bullies, but when there is pushback, they play the victim card. Now I am here
to tell you that the heart of the problem is not that they do this, but that a large
swath of the U.S. population actually believes them.
To be fair this truly is bi-partisan
and has been going on for a very long time. It is a condition that has plagued
both the Right and the Left. In fact I have spoken out about this in the past: The
End of Political Party Dominance in America.
But now the lies, half-truths and
attacks, like a proverbial snowball, which started its glacial existence as a magnificent
little snowflake, have metastasized into a malevolent icy mass that threatens
all in its path.
Case in point this tweet from Senator
Kamala Harris (D - Ca.)
Now, it’s not so much the tweet
from her that bothers me, but its existence as a vehicle. See, I get the fact that she is trying to score political
points and that is what politicians do. No, what truly bothers me is the vast
amount of replies, likes and re-tweets that serve to take it to its intended destination,
Kamala’s political base. My first
inclination was to reply directly, but I fundamentally know that it is a waste
of time, so I decided to use this as a premise for this blog.
You see, Senator Harris is engaging
in one of three things: Lying, telling a
half-truth or she is simply incompetent.
Now that may sound like some
serious accusations, but give me a moment to spell this out for you.
Consider the premise. An article
by Vox, which boldly claims “Senate Republicans exempt own health coverage from
part of latest proposal,” coupled with Senator Harris’ reply, a simple, but
substantive: “This is a disgrace.”
The casual reader, as exemplified
by the replies to this tweet, would take away two things from this. 1)
Republicans are disgusting, greedy, and unethical hypocrites and 2) Sen.
Harris, who by virtue of her position as a United States Senator, intimately understands
the issue and concurs with the Vox piece.
You would believe that, but you
would be wrong.
The opening paragraph of the
article charges that: “Senate Republicans included a provision that exempts
members of Congress and their staff from part of their latest health care plan.”
It goes on to say that “This
exemption could have the effect of ensuring that members of Congress have
coverage for a wider array of benefits than other Americans who purchase their
own coverage.”
That would be pretty staggering,
and point to a serious disconnect between politicians and the people, if it were
true, but it’s not. Unlike the thousands of folks that responded to that Tweet,
I’m not a casual reader.
The underlying problem with this
whole issue goes back to semantics.
Did the Republicans include a
provision that exempts members of Congress and their staff from part of their
latest health care plan? The short answer is: Yes, which is precisely where
Senator Harris wants you to stop reading and re-tweet her post. However, as is
true with most things in politics, the long answer is not as cut and dry.
Now we can debate the entirety of
the health care issue in America, but the truth, as it pertains to this matter,
is that the Republicans are getting ZERO support from Democrats when it comes
to this. As a result, they have to pursue this through a process which is
called Reconciliation
that is bound by several conditions, often referred to as the Byrd
Rule, after former Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV).
Bumper sticker version: Without the hope of Democrats coming on
board, there is no chance to get the 60+ Filibuster-proof votes needed to pass
any health care legislation. Therefore, Republicans have to go for a simple
majority (51) vote and this this now becomes an issue of the Rules of the
Senate as it pertains to Reconciliation.
What that means is that committees
(in this case: Finance and HELP (Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions)) drafting
a bill cannot make changes that are the jurisdiction of other
committees (In this case: Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee).
A Senate
parliamentarian could rule that any proposed insurance change for members
of Congress would rightly fall to the HSGAC, which covers insurance issues for
members of Congress, and that ruling could jeopardize the bill’s reconciliation
status. If this were to occur, then the entire bill would lose privilege and it
could then be filibustered.
But wait a minute; shouldn’t a
member of the Senate know this stuff?
The long and short answer is a
resounding YES.
So if Senator Harris knows this, then
why is she posting something as fallacious as this?
It’s a good question.
As I mentioned earlier, it’s my
belief that she is engaging in one of three things: Lying, telling a half-truth or is simply
incompetent.
Prior to becoming a United States
senator, Kamala Harris served as the District Attorney for San Francisco (2003-2011)
and California Attorney General (2010-2016). So the idea that she is simply incompetent
has little traction. That brings us to lying or telling a half-truth.
Conveniently, Senator Harris
never actually makes the false claim against her fellow (Republican) senators,
so she escapes the mantle of liar. Rather, she simply tosses out the link,
along with her commentary, in an attempt to bait her constituents into running
with the lie, which, since they are already pre-disposed to disliking
Republicans, they gladly do.
And therein lies the true Heart
of the American Problem: US.
We need to understand that politicians
and pundits sell a product. One does it to get elected (or re-elected as the
case may be) while the other does it for ratings, but in the end we are the
consumer that supports it.
I am reminded of a line from one
of my favorite movies, Animal House, where Dean Wormer says: “Fat, drunk and stupid
is no way to go through life, son.”
I fear that is what we have
become in America.
We have become fat through all the things
available to us here in the U.S. Say what you will about systemic poverty, but
the truth is that for the overwhelming
majority of folks that live here, we know nothing about what true poverty is. It’s
kind of hard to claim how bad things are when you’re lamenting about how
miserable your life is on a social media post that you uploaded from your smart
phone.
We have become drunk in our own hubris. We have
come to believe that we are smarter than we actually are. Yesterday I was
talking to my wife about things I consider generational shortcomings. I remarked
that when we were younger there was actual work involved in research; including
numerous trips to the library where we studied and took copious notes. This
generation literally has access to the entire world, at its fingertips, yet
they rarely touch on anything more than the surface of a particular topic.
We have become stupid in our belief that we are
being told the truth.
At worse, the pundits and
politicians lie to us simply because they know they can. Often they skew things
so that it is only a half-truth, as is the case here, but it is still
wrong. I truly believe that things will
not change in this country until we, as Americans, wake up to the deceit that
is being perpetrated against us.
It is interesting to note that, in
the early days of trying to put together the Affordable Care Act, Democrats
were roundly criticized for exempting Congress and their staffers from the
exchanges. Ironically, it was the Republicans who pushed the idea that if the
exchanges were good enough for other Americans that they should be good enough
for Congress. It was an amendment by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R – IA) to the
Senate bill that required the federal government offer only health plans that
were part of an exchange to members of Congress and their staffs.
Maybe we should demand actual
facts and not skewed talking points.
Maybe we should hold politicians and
pundits accountable.
Maybe we should, but that won’t happen
until we stop being casual readers and start educating ourselves about the
issues, rather than relying on cute sound bites.
Maybe we should, but honestly I
think we just might be too far gone. I think we have become too invested in all
the lies to admit that we have been duped, but that is a topic I will discuss
at a later date.
